The clearest path to commercial fusion power
We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
Other uncategorised cookies are those that are being analysed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
The Building Blocks:
Simulation & Rapid Prototyping
Stellarators were exceedingly difficult to design in the past, until the advent of supercomputing.
The vast number of free parameters in stellarator designs used to make them impossible. No more.
Our cloud-based stellarator optimization and design framework, StarFinder, allows us to rapidly iterate on QI stellarator designs at lower costs and higher speed than ever before.
High-Temperature Superconductors
Superconducting materials have zero electrical resistance, and have been revolutionizing magnet technology for decades.
But conventional superconductors require extremely low temperatures, near absolute zero.
Modern high-temperature superconductors (HTS) can reach higher temperatures and magnetic field strengths while also having significantly wider design space, leading to less strict requirements for fusion devices.
HTS technology is at the forefront of leading tokamak developments—but it's equally attractive for stellarators, which are less constrained by current-driven operational limits.
QI-HTS Stellarators
Proxima Fusion is developing quasi-isodynamic (QI) stellarators, a magnetic confinement approach in which toroidal currents cancel out to zero, resulting in uniquely robust features.
W7-X is an invaluable prototype and testbed for this concept.
The scientific basis for QI stellarators has been spearheaded by our partners at the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (for example, Helander & Nührenberg, PPCF 2009 and Goodman, Xanthopoulos, Plunk et al., PRX Energy 2024).
We believe that QI stellarators using high-temperature superconducting (HTS) magnets offer the clearest path to putting fusion on the grid.
In the absence of toroidal plasma currents, current-driven instabilities can be completely eliminated, together with the risk of disruptions that can occur in tokamaks and other stellarator concepts.
QI-HTS stellarators like Proxima's first-of-a-kind fusion power plant concept, Stellaris, also offer a proven heat exhaust concept: the island divertor, which was demonstrated on W7-AS and W7-X at the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics.
Explore Stellaris
Stellaris is designed to produce more power per unit volume than any stellarator power plant designed before.
The much stronger magnetic fields enabled by HTS magnet technology also allow for a significant reduction in size compared to previous stellarator concepts.
Our peer-reviewed fusion power plant concept, Stellaris, has been published in Fusion Engineering and Design.
Stellaris is the first stellarator concept to integrate electromagnetic, structural, thermal, and neutronics simulations, resulting in a fully coherent design.
Stellarators
vs.
Tokamaks
Stellarators and tokamaks differ in their tradeoffs of design vs. operational complexity: stellarators, while harder to design, are easier to operate, because they can be designed to run stably in continuous operation.
Stellarators have far more degrees of freedom, meaning that they can be optimized in countless ways, while tokamak designs are relatively inflexible.
Tokamaks have so far been at the forefront of fusion science. However, stellarators are now feasible to design and build—and with the publication of Stellaris, QI-HTS stellarators have emerged as the most attractive approach to commercial fusion power plants.
Get in touch
press@proximafusion.com
info@proximafusion.com